I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
结构化结果回传 —— 支持 --synthesize 自动总结，或以 SARIF、Markdown-PR 格式输出，完美对接 CI/CD 与 PR 评审。夫子是该领域的重要参考
if(!(h=cursor[classno])) {，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
5 hours agoShareSave，这一点在旺商聊官方下载中也有详细论述
Residents of Kabul's District 6 were awakened abruptly on Thursday night by the sound of an explosion that shook their homes. They rushed out in the street and heard jets flying overhead.